SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Jhk) 378

D.N.PRASAD
MATHURA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
I.N.Gupta, N.N.Sinha

Judgment :

D. N. PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under S. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the entire criminal proceeding of Patan P. S. Case No. 16 of 1997 corresponding to G. R. No. 124 of 1997 relating to SC/st No. 19 of 1997 by which the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamau at Daltonganj took cognizance of the offence under Ss. 341, 323, 342, 504, 379, 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Ss. 3/4 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (the Act ).

( 2 ) THE short facts giving rise to the prosecution case is that one Bhukhli Devi wife of Santu Bhuinya and Nirmala Devi wife of Jai Prakash Ram had gone defecate near a Government Pond early in the morning at 6 a. m. Shortly thereafter the petitioners came there and abused them and also reprimanded them for having come near the Pond. There is also an allegation that the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 took away the golden chain from the person of Nirmala Devi. They had earlier abused and assaulted the female folk and also there is an allegation of outrage modesty. Accordingly, a First Information Report was lodged against the accused/petitioners.

( 3 ) THE learned counsel f





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top