( 1 ) THIS letters patent appeal is directed against the order dated 8-10-2001 passed by the learned single Judge in Misc. Appeal No. 1/99.

( 2 ) WE have heard Mr. S. B. Gadodia, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants and Mr. N. K. Prasad, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents on the question of maintainability of the appeal since a preliminary objection was raised by the respondents that this letters patent appeal is not maintainable.

( 3 ) THE aforementioned Misc. Appeal No. 1/99 was filed by the appellants under Order 43, Rule 1 (i) of the C. P. C. challenging the order dated 23-12-98 passed by the 7th Addl. Sub-Judge, Ranchi in Misc. Case No. 26/98. The said Misc. Case No. 26/98 arose out of an Execution case No. 1/83a. It appears that the plaintiffs-respondents obtained a decree for specific performance of agreement for sale passed in title suit No. 8 125/81. The decree-holders levied said Execution Case No. 1/83a and in the said execution proceeding the decree-holders deposited the balance amount of consideration and filed a draft sale deed which was approved. The draft sale deed was typed on stamped paper and filed in Court whi