SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Jhk) 1228

M.Y.EQBAL
BAJRANGHLAL SINGHANIA – Appellant
Versus
RATAN CHANDRA GHOSH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K.PRASAD, RAJIV RANJAN DWIVEDI, S.L.AGARWAL

Judgment :

M. Y. EQBAL, J.

( 1 ) HEARD the Parties. This revision application is directed against the order dated 28-9-2002 passed by munsif at Jamshedpur in Execution Case No. 23/98 whereby he has held that before passing order for issuance of writ of delivery of possession, notice to show cause against one of the judgment debtors is mandatary in view of provisions of Order XXI, Rule 22 (1) (a) of the C. P. C.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case lies in a narrow compass.

( 3 ) PETITIONER filed Eviction Suit No. 124/ 92 for eviction of the defendants/opposite parties on the ground of personal necessity. The suit was decreed in terms of judgment dated 31-8-1998. The decree holder opposite parties levied Execution Case No. 23/98 for execution of the decree. In the meantime, opposite parties preferred civil revision being c. R. No. 519/98r efore this Court challenging the judgment and decree passed by the munsif. The Civil Revision was dismissed on 10-8-2001. The opposite parties then filed s. L. P, No. 7049/2002 which was also dismissed on 22-3-2002. While dismissing the appeal the Supreme Court observed that if appellants file undertaking to vacate the premises then the decree shall not be










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top