SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Jhk) 1153

GURUSHARAN SHARMA, H.S.PRASAD
SANJEEDA KHATOON – Appellant
Versus
SHER AH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARVIND LAL, RAJIV ANAND

Judgment :

RUSHARAN SHARMA AND HARI SHANKAR PRASAD, JJ.

( 1 ) HEARD the parties. Appellant was wife of Md. Miyajan Ansari, son of md. Sher Ali of village Kundi, District ranchi. Her husband died in a motor accident dated 13. 5. 1989. She along with parents of her deceased husband filed compensation Case No. 82 of 1989 under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, lohardaga, which was disposed of by order dated 25. 8. 2000. She is aggrieved by the observation made in the said order that if Sanjeeda Khatoon, widow of the deceased is remarried with another person after the death of her husband, she will not be entitled to get any amount of compensation and in that case entire amount would be received by parents of the deceased.

( 2 ) THERE was a delay of about 8 months in filing the appeal. Hence, I. A. No. 1233 of 2002 at flag b was filed to condone the delay. Show-cause notice-in appeal as well as on condonation application was issued to the respondents on 30. 7. 2002. Thereafter they have appeared. For the reasons stated in the condonation application at flag b delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

( 3 ) MD. Miyajan Ansari was employed







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top