SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Jhk) 313

High Court Of Jharkhand
Judgename : H. S. PRASAD
PREM CHAND MAHTO - Appellant
Versus
LAXMI DEVI - Respondents
Cri. M. P. 700 Of 2002
Decided On : 03/05/2003

Advocates Appeared:
A.BANERJEE, G.M.MISHRA, U.MISHRA

The annulment of a marriage under Section 12(C) of the Hindu Marriage Act affects the entitlement to maintenance, but the child born from the annulled marriage may still be entitled to maintenance under Section 125, Cr. P. C.

Headnote:

Maintenance - Hindu Marriage Act - Section 125, Cr. P. C. - 12(C) of the Hindu Marriage Act - 125 - 12 - 482 - 397 - 483

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed for quashing an order for maintenance to the respondent and her son. The petitioner claimed that the marriage was annulled under Section 12(C) of the Hindu Marriage Act and, therefore, the respondent was not entitled to maintenance.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was annulled, making the respondent not entitled to maintenance. However, the child born from the respondent was entitled to maintenance under Section 125, Cr. P. C.

Issues: The main issue was whether the respondent and her son were entitled to maintenance despite the annulment of the marriage under Section 12(C) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the annulment of the marriage under Section 12(C) of the Hindu Marriage Act rendered the respondent not entitled to maintenance, but the child born from the respondent was entitled to maintenance under Section 125, Cr. P. C.

Final Decision: The court partly allowed the revision, setting aside the maintenance order for the respondent but allowing maintenance for the child born from the respondent.

Judgment :

H. S. PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS application, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the "code") has been filed for quashing the impugned order dated 24-6-2002 passed in Cr. Rev. No. 75/1999/6/2000 by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Bermo at tenughat and also for quashing the order dated 15-9-1999 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat in Maintenance Case No. 25 of 1997.

( 2 ) THE present application has arisen out of an order passed in revision application No. 75/99/6/2000. Opposite party No. 2 along with her son opposite party No. 3 filed a petition before learned Court below for allowing them maintenance on the ground that opposite party No. 1 is legally wedded wife of petitioner and opposite party No. 2 is their son. Opposite party No. 2 further alleged in the petition that the marriage was solemnized in the year 1992 according to Hindu Rites and Customs. Till 2 and 1/2 years the marital relation between them, (petitioner and opposite party No. 2) remained peaceful but thereafter on account of illegal demand made by the parents of the petitioner and non-fulfilment of the demands on the part of the opposite party No. 2 and her parents, she was subjected to cruelty and several panchayaties were convened in order to settle the disputes between them but there was no result and ultimately opposite party No. 1 was driven out from the house of the petitioner when she was carrying a pregnancy. Finding no way opposite party No. 1 took shelter in the house of her parents and was blessed with a son, Opposite party No. 2 alleged that she has no source of income of her own to maintain her and her son, whereas petitioner has got sufficient means. She filed a petition for maintenance, which was allowed and opposite party No. 1 was granted a sum of Rs. 300. 00 as a maintenance allowance and her son was granted a sum of Rs. 150. 00 as maintenance allowance. As against the order of the learned Court below, petitioner preferred revision before the Sessions Judge, which was registered as criminal revision No. 75/1996/6/2000, which was transferred to the Court of 1st Addl. Sessions Judge Bermo at Tenughat and the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, after hearing the parties, dismissed the revision application.

( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has filed Title (M) Suit No. 7 of 1994-95 against the opposite party No. 1 for annulment of the marriage by a decree of nullity under Section 12 (C) of the Hindu Marriage Act and the said suit was decreed ex parte vide order dated 20-6-1997, as the opposite party No. 1 did not appear and it was held that the "marriage of the petitioner with the respondent (opposite party No. 1) which is voidable is annulled under Section 12 (C) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

( 4 ) LEARNED counsel further pointed out the opposite party filed Miscellaneous case No. 26 of 1997, under Order 9, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for setting aside the ex parte decree dated 20-6-1997 and said Miscellaneous case was dismissed by order dated 2-12-1999 and then the opposite party No. 2 filed a miscellaneous application No. 1993 of 2000 before the Honble Jharkhand High Court against the order dated 2-12-1999 but that, too, being miscellaneous appeal No. 193 of 2000 has been dismissed by the Honble High Court. It was further submitted that on the day of marriage on 11-4-1992, age of the petitioner was below 17 years as the date of birth of the petitioner is 2-6-1975. The revisional Court was informed about the decisions passed in Title (M) No. 7/94 and Miscellaneous appeal No. 193/2000. It was also pointed out that the instant application for maintenance under Section 125, Cr. P. C. was filed in 1997 being Maintenance Case No. 25/97 disposed of on 15-9-1999. It was also pointed out that as the marriage between the petitioner and opposite party No. 2 stands annulled under Section 12 (C) of the Hindu Marriage Act,










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top