SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Jhk) 313

H.S.PRASAD
PREM CHAND MAHTO – Appellant
Versus
LAXMI DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.BANERJEE, G.M.MISHRA, U.MISHRA

Judgment :

H. S. PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS application, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the "code") has been filed for quashing the impugned order dated 24-6-2002 passed in Cr. Rev. No. 75/1999/6/2000 by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Bermo at tenughat and also for quashing the order dated 15-9-1999 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat in Maintenance Case No. 25 of 1997.

( 2 ) THE present application has arisen out of an order passed in revision application No. 75/99/6/2000. Opposite party No. 2 along with her son opposite party No. 3 filed a petition before learned Court below for allowing them maintenance on the ground that opposite party No. 1 is legally wedded wife of petitioner and opposite party No. 2 is their son. Opposite party No. 2 further alleged in the petition that the marriage was solemnized in the year 1992 according to Hindu Rites and Customs. Till 2 and 1/2 years the marital relation between them, (petitioner and opposite party No. 2) remained peaceful but thereafter on account of illegal demand made by the parents of the petitioner and non-fulfilment of the demands on the part of the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top