SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Jhk) 253

TAPEN SEN
AJAY KUMAR AGARWALA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KALYAN ROY, PRABHASH KUMAR, R.S.Majumdar

Judgment :

TAPEN SEN, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Mr. Prabhash Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. R. S. Majumdar, learned Government Advocate for the State; and Mr. Kalyan Roy, learned counsel for the Opposite Party No. 2.

( 2 ) THE instant application invoking the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed for quashing the order dated 6-6-2002 passed in Criminal Revision No. 24 of 2002 by learned Sessions Judge, Koderma by reason whereof he dismissed the Revision Application itself.

( 3 ) THE revision application in turn was filed against the order dated 6-3-2002 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in Case No. 136 of 2000 (T. R. No. 551 of 2002) by which he rejected the petition dated 18-6-2001 filed by these petitioners wherein they had prayed for acquitting them in terms of the provisions contained under Section 256 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and for discharging them under Section 249 of the said Code. The ground taken in the petition for acquittal and discharge was that the complainant had died on 6-6-2001 and that cognizance under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top