SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Jhk) 250

High Court Of Jharkhand
Judgename : M. Y. EQBAL
NAGESHWAR THAKUR - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND - Respondents
W. P. (C) 3313 Of 2002
Decided On : 02/24/2003

Advocates Appeared:
B.S.Lal, Manjul Prasad

The main legal point established is that there is no provision empowering the Registrar or Sub-Registrar to hold an inquiry on the question of title of the vendor before registration of the documents.

Headnote:

Jurisdiction - Registration of Documents - The court held that the direction issued by the Collector-cum-Registrar to the Sub-Registrar to enquire and verify the title of the vendor before registration of a document was without jurisdiction as there is no provision empowering the Registrar or Sub-Registrar to hold an inquiry on the question of title of the vendor before registration of the documents.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged the authority of the Collector-cum-Registrar who directed the Sub-Registrar to enquire and verify the title of the vendor before registration of a document. The petitioners claimed to be the owners of the property and had executed sale deeds for various reasons.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the direction issued by the Collector-cum-Registrar to the Sub-Registrar was without jurisdiction as there is no provision empowering the Registrar or Sub-Registrar to hold an inquiry on the question of title of the vendor before registration of the documents. The court allowed the writ application and set aside the impugned order.

Issues: The main issue was the authority of the Collector-cum-Registrar to direct the Sub-Registrar to enquire and verify the title of the vendor before registration of a document.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that there is no provision in the Indian Registration Act or Rules empowering the Registrar or Sub-Registrar to hold an inquiry on the question of title of the vendor before registration of the documents.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ application and set aside the impugned order issued by the Registrar, so far it relates to directing the Sub-Registrar to enquire into and verify the title of the vendor before registration of the documents.

Judgment :

M. Y. EQBAL, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONERS have challenged the authority of the Collector-cum-Registrar, lateharwho issued direction vide memo No. 711 dated 7-8-2001 directing the Sub-Registrar, Latehar to enquire and verify the title of the vendor before registration of a document.

( 2 ) IT appears that petitioners executed sale deeds in the name of different persons and presented before the Sub-Registrar for registration. Petitioners case is that they are the owner of the property and for meeting medical treatment and loan and also marriage expenses, they proposed to sell their property. After presentation of the documents Sub-Registrar informed that inquiry with regard to their title should be made by the Deputy Commissioner Land Reforms and the Circle Officer. It is alleged that more than six months have passed from the date of presentation of the documents but till date on the pretext of the inquiry registration has been deferred. From perusal of the impugned order issued by the Collector-cum-Registrar, latehar, it appears that he has directed the sub-Registrar inter alia to examine and verify the title of the vendor before registration of a document.

( 3 ) IN course of argument, Mr. B. S. Lall, addl. Advocate General, very fairly submitted that first part of the impugned order whereby the Collector directed the Sub-Registrar to enquire into the title of the vendor before registration is wholly without jurisdiction.

( 4 ) IT is well settled that a Registration officer has got right to impound a document presented before him, if it appears to him that the same is not duly stamped, but there is no provision in the Indian Registration act empowering the District Sub-Registrar to refuse registration of a document on the ground of under valuation or to enquire into the correctness of the valuation as given in the document. There is also no provision in the Indian Registration Act or Rules made thereunder empowering the Registrar or sub-Registrar to hold an inquiry on the question of title of the vendor before registration of the documents. The Registering offieer has only to see whether document is duly stamped on the valuation as given in the document.

( 5 ) FOR the aforesaid reasons, this writ application is allowed and the impugned order issued by the Registrar, so far it relates to directing the Sub-Registrar to enquire into and verify the title of the vendor before registration of the documents, is set aside, as being wholly without jurisdiction. Application allowed.

--- *** ---

.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top