SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Jhk) 250

M.Y.EQBAL
NAGESHWAR THAKUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.S.Lal, Manjul Prasad

Judgment :

M. Y. EQBAL, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONERS have challenged the authority of the Collector-cum-Registrar, lateharwho issued direction vide memo No. 711 dated 7-8-2001 directing the Sub-Registrar, Latehar to enquire and verify the title of the vendor before registration of a document.

( 2 ) IT appears that petitioners executed sale deeds in the name of different persons and presented before the Sub-Registrar for registration. Petitioners case is that they are the owner of the property and for meeting medical treatment and loan and also marriage expenses, they proposed to sell their property. After presentation of the documents Sub-Registrar informed that inquiry with regard to their title should be made by the Deputy Commissioner Land Reforms and the Circle Officer. It is alleged that more than six months have passed from the date of presentation of the documents but till date on the pretext of the inquiry registration has been deferred. From perusal of the impugned order issued by the Collector-cum-Registrar, latehar, it appears that he has directed the sub-Registrar inter alia to examine and verify the title of the vendor before registration of a document.

( 3 ) IN course of argum





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top