SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Jhk) 1048

M.Y.EQBAL
SUDIST NARAIN THAKUR – Appellant
Versus
BIHAR STATE FINANCIAL CORPN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.K.Lal, P.P.N.ROY

Judgment :

M. Y. EQBAL, J.

( 1 ) THE main question that falls for consideration in this writ application is whether the respondents-Bihar State Financial Corporation is entitled to charge interest on the sanctioned amount of loan from the date of sanction or from the date when the actual possession of the assets has been delivered to the petitioner.

( 2 ) IT appears that the unit of M/s. Bihar wood Product, Daltonganj was auction sold by the respondent-Corporation and the bid of the petitioner was accepted. Out of the total consideration amount of Rs. 5,25000/- the petitioner deposited Rs. 1,31,250/- within the stipulated time as per the agreement. After, issuance of sale order an agreement was executed by and between the petitioner and the respondent-Corporation on 31-1-95 and on the same day actual physical possession of the premises was given to the petitioner. After handing over possession of the premises the petitioner started making repayment of the amount to the Corporation. The petitioner learnt at a later stage that the Corporation is charging interest from the date when the auction was held some times in 1994.

( 3 ) RESPONDENTS case, on the other hand, is that the Board of







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top