SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Jhk) 366

LAKSHMANA RAO, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
RAJENDRA PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
UMESH KUMAR CHOUBEY

Judgment :

( 1 ) APPELLANT Rajendra pandey has preferred this appeal against the order of Acquittal dated 16-12-2002, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Chatra in compliant Case No. 324 of 1999 (T. R. No. 102 of 2002) whereby and whereunder, the learned Court below has acquitted respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4 for the charges u/s. 430 and 447, I. P. C.

( 2 ) THE case of the complainant-petitioner is that the respondents trespassed the land situated in Khata No. 91 and Plot No. 979 having an area of 0. 01 decimal in which Well was excavated by his ancestors. It (well) was in use for drinking water and irrigation purpose but the respondents demolished the well and construct wall of the tank of latrine on it.

( 3 ) THE respondents in course of trial took plea that the land was purchased by them from Shiv Prasad Pandey under registered sale deed in which there was an old Well. Since last ten years it was not in use and was damaged as is evident from the order passed u/s. 147 Cr. P. C. by Executive magistrate, Chatra in Case No. 49 of 1999. Due to passage of time the Well was damaged and in a family partition that portion was given in the share of Shiv Prasad Pandey, who under registered





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top