SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, LAKSHMANA RAO
SARO RANA AND OTHERS, APPELLANTS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND, RESPONDENT – Respondent
LAKSHMAN URAON, J.
( 1 ) APPELANTS. HAVE preferred this appeal against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30th April, 2002 passed by Shri Sita ram Mahato. learned 1st Additional Sessions judge, Deoghar in Sessions Trial No. 47 of 2001/19 of 2001 convicting the appellants under Section 304 B IPC and sentencing to undergo R. I. for life and further convicting them under Section 201/34 [pc. but no separate sentence under the said section was passed against the appellants.
( 2 ) THE prosecution case has arisen on the written information (Ext. 1) lodged bv informant Leela Devi (PW 11) on 27-7-2000 at 15. 45 alleging therein that her daughter renu Devi (since deceased) was married with appellant No. 2 Shyam Sundar Rana of kurmidih in the month of May. 1997. Shyam sundar Rana was demanding money for construction of house. As the informant was unable to pay, hence on 25-7-2000 appellant No. 2 Shyam Sunder Rana and his family members, who are the remaining appellants, murdered Renu Devi and threw her dead body into the well. They also burnt the dead body. All the appellants are resident of village Kurmidih within the jurisdiction of Madhupur P. S. , District D
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.