SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Jhk) 1017

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
NIROOP MOHANTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.M.MISHRA

Judgment :

S. J. MUKHOPADHAYA, J.

( 1 ) ALL these applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure have been preferred by the two sets of petitioners. The petitioners Niroop Mohanty and Arun Narayan singh are petitioners in Cr. M. P. Nos. 109/2004, 110/2004 and 113/2004 whereas a. K. Choudhary is the petitioner in Cr. M. P. No. 151 of 2004. The petitioners are the Vice president of H. R. M. , Deputy Managing: director, Corporate Service and Head of h. R. /ir, Tube Division of Tata Iron and Steel company Ltd. (for short TISCO ). In Cr. M. P no. 109/2004 the petitioners have challenged the order dated December 19, 2002 passed in c/2 Case No. 4101/2002, whereby and whereunder, the learned Chief Judicial magistrate, Jamshedpur has taken cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 22-A of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 against the. petitioners and one Imamuddin Khan. In Cr. M. P. No. 110/2004 the petitioners have challenged the order dated December 19, 2002 passed in C/2 Case No. 4102/2002 by learned chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, whereby and whereunder, the cognizance has been taken against the petitioners for the offences punishable under Section 22-A of th









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top