SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
KRISHNA KANT SINHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent
S. J. MUKHOPADHAYA, J.
( 1 ) THIS application has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing the order dated 21st July, 2003, passed by Sri sanjeev Jha, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st class. Ranchi, in Case NOC-III268 of 2002, which was registered for the offences under sections 22 and 22 (A) of the Minimum wages Act, 1948. By the aforesaid order, the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, ranchi, rejected the application, preferred by the petitioners under Section 205 of the code of Criminal Procedure (in short "cr. P. C. ") to dispense with their personal appearance and to allow them to be represented through their lawyer during trial.
( 2 ) IT appears that a case has been filed by opposite party No. 2, Labour Superintendent, ranchi, against one M/s. Advance diagnostic Central, Bariyatu, and these two petitioners as Its Director and Manager. It has been alleged that on 22nd June, 2002 at about 12. 10 p. m. an inspection of the establishment of M/s. Diagnostic Center, bariyatu, was made and during course of such Inspection, it was found that the required statutory forms and documents have not been maintained. On demand, the employee of M/s. Advance Diagnostic Centr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.