SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Jhk) 842

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
KRISHNA KANT SINHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PANDEY NIRAJ RAI

Judgment :

S. J. MUKHOPADHAYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS application has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing the order dated 21st July, 2003, passed by Sri sanjeev Jha, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st class. Ranchi, in Case NOC-III268 of 2002, which was registered for the offences under sections 22 and 22 (A) of the Minimum wages Act, 1948. By the aforesaid order, the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, ranchi, rejected the application, preferred by the petitioners under Section 205 of the code of Criminal Procedure (in short "cr. P. C. ") to dispense with their personal appearance and to allow them to be represented through their lawyer during trial.

( 2 ) IT appears that a case has been filed by opposite party No. 2, Labour Superintendent, ranchi, against one M/s. Advance diagnostic Central, Bariyatu, and these two petitioners as Its Director and Manager. It has been alleged that on 22nd June, 2002 at about 12. 10 p. m. an inspection of the establishment of M/s. Diagnostic Center, bariyatu, was made and during course of such Inspection, it was found that the required statutory forms and documents have not been maintained. On demand, the employee of M/s. Advance Diagnostic Centr









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top