SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Jhk) 288

M.Y.EQBAL
NARENDRA BUTALA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K.PANDEY

Judgment :

( 1 ) HEARD the parties.

( 2 ) PETITIONER seeks a direction upon the respondents particularly respondent No. 3, the District Sub-Registrar, Ranchi to register the sale-deed presented by the petitioner with respect to the land measuring eight kathas, comprised within Municipal Survey no, 1359, Holding No. 35, situated at Lalpur, ranchi.

( 3 ) PETITIONERs case is that the land originally belongs to Smt. Jasoda Sundarl Roy. The said Jasoda Sundari Roy transferred the said land to Smt. Uma Shashi Dasee w/o jatindra Mohan Chandra by virtue of registered sale-deed dated 20-6-1938. After the death of Uma Shashi Dasee and Jatindra mohan Chandra, their sons inherited the said property and consequently they got their name mutated in the revenue records vide Mutation Case No. 1134 R 27/78-79. Petitioner as an Attorney of the heirs of recorded tenant presented the sale-deed for registration in favour of the vendees. Sub-Registrar instead of registering the documents of sale, the same was sent to the Circle officer for verification. The Circle Officer said to have reported that the land in question is not a lease property. The contention of the petitioner is that in spite of the said






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top