SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Jhk) 517

ALTAMAS KABIR, R.K.MERATHIA
NASREEN BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.K.Maltlyar, S.AKHTAR HUSSAIN

Judgment :

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 25-6-2004 passed by the Principal judge, Family Court, Jamshedpur in a proceeding under Section 125 of the Code of criminal Procedure. The appeal has been put up by the department for hearing under order 41 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure together with a note regarding its maintainability as an appeal.

( 2 ) CHAPTER V of the Family Courts Act, 1984 which contains Section 19 provides for appeals and revisions against the orders of the Family Court. Section 19 (1) provides for appeal as a matter of right from every judgment or order, not being an interlocutory order, of a Family Court to the High Court both on facts and on law. In our view, under the said provision, the question of hearing an appeal under Order 41 Rule 11 C. P. C. would not arise. On the other hand, subsection (4) of Section 19 makes special provision for revision either suo motu or otherwise by the High Court in respect of orders passed under Chapter IX of the Code of criminal Procedure in which Section 125 is included.

( 3 ) IT appears to have been intention of the Legislature that against the orders passed under Section 125





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top