SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Jhk) 686

AMARESHWAR SAHAY
PANKAJ BIBHUTI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anita Sinha, ASHOK SINHA, V.P.SINGH

Judgment :

( 1 ) ALL the appellants were tried for the offence under Sections 304 B/34 of the Indian Penal Code for committing the dowry death of Nitu Devi in furtherance of common intention and also for the charges under Sections 498 A/34 of the Indian Penal Code for subjecting Nitu Devi (deceased)for cruelty in connection with demand of dowry.

( 2 ) THE learned 1st Additional Sessions judge, Garhwa by his judgment dated 22-5-2004 in Sessions trial No. 138/2001 convicted the appellant No. 1, for the offence under Section 304-B I. P. C. as well as under Section 498- A/34 I. P. C. and sentenced him to undergo R. I. for a period of 10 years for the offence under Section 304 B of the I. P. C. , however no separate sentence was passed for the offence under Section 498-A, ipc. The Appellant Nos. 2 to 5 were acquitted from the charge under Section 304-B I. P. C. but they were convicted for the offence under section 498 A/34, I. P. C. and were sentenced to undergo R. I. for a period of two years each and also to pay fine of Rs. 500/- each in default to undergo S. I. for two months. Against the said judgment and conviction and sentence, the present appeal has been filed by the appellants.




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top