SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Jhk) 15

N.DHINAKAR, M.Y.EQBAL
SOWAM KISKU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR (NOW JHARKHAND) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MUKUL PRASAD

Judgment :

( 1 ) THE appellants, ten in number, were arrayed as accused before the trial Judge with the allegation that at about 6. 30 p. m. on 18-8-1983 they caused the death of Dugu Ram Das Kisku by beating him with Lathi, Bhala, Farsa and Tangi. The learned trial Judge, finding" the appellants guilty under Section 302 Indian Penal Code (shortly 1pc), sentenced each of them with the aid of Section 149, IPC to undergo imprisonment for life. The present appeal is against the said conviction and sentence.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case are: at about 6. 30 p. m. on 18-8-1983, the deceased Dugu Ram Das Kisku was returning from his village Hatia accompanied by his brother PW. 1 Betka Kisku. When he was reaching the house of Bihar Kisku (appellant No. 7), all the appellant surrounded him and PW. 1 and attacked him with the weapons which they had in their hands. PW. 1 managed to escape but Dugu Ram Das kisku suffered injury and died at the spot. Thereafter, the information of the incident (Ext. 1) was given by PW. 1 to Godda (Mussafil) Police Station at about 9. 00 a. m. on 19-8-1983 on the basis of which FIR (Ext. 2) was registered. Investigation of the crime was taken up by the PW. 9, the













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top