SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Jhk) 813

High Court Of Jharkhand
Judgename : D. K. SINHA, J.
RAMCHANDRA YADAV - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND - Respondents
Crl. M. P. 40 Of 2006
Decided On : 07/08/2006

Advocates Appeared:
R.A.Chaubey, T.N.Verma

The subsequent FIR for the same set of occurrence was not sustainable in law and was quashed, in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the proposition of law laid down by the Apex Court.

Headnote:

FIR - Quashing - Section 482 - [Section 154(1) Code of Criminal Procedure] - The court quashed the subsequent FIR (Chauparan P. S. Case No. 85/05) for the same set of occurrence as the original FIR (Chauparan P. S. Case No. 84/05) lodged on a subsequent day, citing the Apex Court's proposition of law in T. T. Antony v. State of Kerala. The subsequent FIR was deemed to be the statement of a witness under Section 162(1) of the Cr. P. C. and not treated as the First Information Report received by the Police.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought to quash the FIR of Chauparan P. S. Case No. 85/2005, alleging that it was a concocted statement implicating innocent persons, and that the subsequent FIR was not sustainable and against the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the subsequent FIR for the same set of occurrence was not sustainable in law and quashed it, granting liberty to the Investigating officer to make a detailed investigation in the original FIR (Chauparan P. S. Case No. 84/05).

Issues: The issues revolved around the sustainability of the subsequent FIR (Chauparan P. S. Case No. 85/05) for the same set of occurrence as the original FIR (Chauparan P. S. Case No. 84/05) lodged on a subsequent day.

Ratio Decidendi: The subsequent FIR was deemed to be the statement of a witness under Section 162(1) of the Cr. P. C. and not treated as the First Information Report received by the Police, leading the court to quash it.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the subsequent FIR (Chauparan P. S. Case No. 85/05) was quashed with the liberty to the Investigating officer to make a detailed investigation in the original FIR (Chauparan P. S. Case No. 84/05).

Judgment :

( 1 ) THE petitioners herein have preferred this petition under Section 482 cr. P. C. for quashing the F. I. R. of Chauparan p. S, Case No. 85/2005 lodged on 22-5-2005 corresponding to G. R. No. 1347/05 arising out of the said police case pending in the court of C. J. M. , Hazaribagh.

( 2 ) THE brief fact of the case, as is evident from the statement of the informant Abdul rauf presented before the Chauparan Police in Chauparan P. S. Case No. 85/05 is that two persons namely Md. Usman and Md. Suleman alias Sule were forcibly taken by as many as 18 named accused persons and few others, variously armed with deadly weapons, such as sticks, rods and axes. Both the persons were tied in a pole of electric transformer, situated near the house of one Bhikhari Rana and were assaulted by fists and slaps by the named accused and others. In the meantime, one Uma Shankar akela of Chauparan arrived at the place of occurrence who also assaulted them with kicks and abetted the villagers, who were present there, to commit their murder. On such abetment the accused persons started assaulting them indiscriminately with sticks, rods and axe, as a result of which the victim md. Usman sustained grievous injuries and became unconscious. The another victim md. Suleman alias Sule also sustained grievous injury. In the meantime, Chauparan Police arrived at the place of occurrence, attempted to take the victims in their custody in spite of resistance made by the accused and only on the arrival of the Senior Police officer with the Additional Police Force, both the victims were removed to Chauparan for their better treatment but the injured Md. Usman succumbed his injury. It was alleged that all the named accused persons with the intention to commit murder assaulted Md. Usman and Md. Suleman alias Sule which resulted into death of Md. Usman.

( 3 ) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner pointed out that the informant of Chauparan p. S. Case No. 85/05 Md. Abdul Rauf presented his written report to the Chauparan police on 22-5-05 for the occurrence which took place on 21-5-2005 at 11. 30 a. m. , the f. I. R. was registered on 22-5-2005 and it was sent to the C. J. M. , Hazaribagh which was received on 24-5-2005.

( 4 ) HE further submitted that prior to the chauparan P. S. Case No. 85/05, the police had registered Chauparan P. S. Case No. 84/05 on 21-5-2005 at 16. 30 hours with respect to the same set of occurrence for the offence under Ss. 147, 342, 353, 504, 120b i. P. C. in which actual fact was narrated in the self statement of the informant Gajanand singh, Sub-Inspector of Police, posted at chauparan Police Station that when he received the information at about 12. 30 hours on 21-5-05 that two thieves were appre-hended by the villagers and were being brutally assaulted by them, he along with Police force came to village Amjhar and found the information true. When he attempted to remove both the victims Md. Usman and Md. Suleman @ Sule, his act was resisted by 4 named accused persons of village Amjhar on the explanation that these two victims had committed murder of their father Nathu yadav by cutting his neck and suspicion was raised also against Abdui Rauf, an informant of Chauparan P. S. Case No. 85/05, about his complicity in the said murder and that Abdul rauf could not be arrested till date by the police. It was further stated that after some time one Uma Shankar Akela, a leader of samajwadi Party also arrived there who tried to pacify the villagers but of no avail and on the information given to the Senior Police officer on cell phone, thelocal Block Development officer, S. D. O. and S. D. P. O. arrived at the scene and took both the victims in their custody. The victims were removed to chauparan where no doctor was available and after some time the victim Md. Usman succumbed his injury and the another Md. Suleman was removed to the local Lifeline hospital and from there he was taken to sadar Hospital, Hazaribagh for better treatment. The c



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top