SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Jhk) 175

R.K.MERATHIA
GITA ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Sinha, A.K.Yadav, J.S.PASARI, MAHESH TIVARI, N.K.PASARI

Judgment :

( 1 ) HEARD the parties for final disposal.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner, the Railways-respondents cannot recover royalty charges from the running or final bill or from the security deposit, and they cannot withhold payment of final bill/release of security deposit for want of Royalty Clearance certificate inasmuch as petitioner is merely purchasing and supplying stone ballasts. Petitioner has further prayed to declare clause 5 and clause 6 of the agreement on the ground that they are unenforceable as opposed to public policy and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

( 3 ) ON 29-3-2005, petitioner entered into an agreement with the respondents for supply of stone ballasts. Clauses 5 and 6 of the agreement reads as follows:-

"5. Royalty charges, at the rate prescribed from time to time, will be recovered from the contractors each and every on account bill and final bill of supply for the supplied ballast at the rate notified by the concerned state Govt. (Mining Authorities) and will be kept under deposit with Railway. The royalty charges so recovered will be refunded back to the contractor after submission of the royalty clearance certificate by the contractor























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top