SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Jhk) 328

M.Y.EQBAL
SUDAMA CHOUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRIKA CHOUDHARY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Araresh Kumar, L.K.Lal, P.PRASAD, Tapeshwar Nath Mishra, V.K.PRASAD

Judgment :

( 1 ) THIS Second Appeal by the defendants-appellants is against the judgment of reversal. The suit filed by the plaintiffs-respondents being Partition Suit no. 116 of 1981 claiming partition of half share in the suit property, was dismissed by the Sub-Judge, Garhwa in terms and judgment and decree dated 21 -9-1987 holding that there had been previous partition between the parties.

( 2 ) IN appeal filed by the plaintiffs-respondents, being Title Appeal No. 23/87, the appellate Court, namely, the Addl. District judge, Garhwa, in terms of judgment and decree dated 21-9-88, allowed the appeal and set aside the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court and decreed the suit.

( 3 ) THIS second appeal was admitted for hearing on 10-7-90 on the following substantial question of law :

"whether the learned Court of appeal below has erred in law in not discussing the vital documentary evidence relied upon by the learned trial Court for coming to the conclusion that there has been a previous partition among the parties?"

( 4 ) THE admitted facts are that Ganeshi rawat was the common ancestor of the parties. He died leaving behind two sons, nakkchhedi Choudhary and Sheo Balak. Plai


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top