D.G.R.PATNAIK
NAHOOM MINZ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
( 1 ) BY this revision application, petitioner has challenged the judgment and order dated 2-5-1998 (signed on 4-5-1998)passed by the 8th Additional Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi in Cr. Appeal No. 14 of 1994 whereby the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the trial court for the offence under Section 418 IPC against the petitioner was upheld and the appeal was dismissed with modification. The petitioner was put on trial for charges under Sections 408, 418, 467, 420 and 120b ipc. The trial Court by its judgment dated 5-2-1993, convicted the petitioner for the offences under Sections 418, 408 and 420 ipc and awarded sentence for each of the offences. It is against this order of conviction, petitioner had filed an appeal vide Cr. Appeal No. 14 of 1994 which was disposed of by the impugned judgment dated 2-5-1998 by the 8th Additional Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi and against the judgment of the appellate Court, the present revision application has been preferred by the petitioner.
( 2 ) THE case against the petitioner was registered on the basis of a complaint filed by the complainant, namely the opposite party no. 2, before the Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.