SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Jhk) 874

R.R.PRASAD
Binod Kumar Das – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


ORDER

R.R. Prasad, J.

1. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned Counsel appearing for the State.

2. This application has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the First Information Report of Bistupur P.S case No. 49 of 2006 corresponding to G.R. case No. 409 of 2006 whereby the case under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code has been registered against the petitioners and others.

3. Before adverting to contention raised on behalf of the petitioners the facts of the case needs to be noted which are as follows: It appears that one Jadunath Soren lodged first information report on 21.2.2006 stating therein that one M/s H.K. Singori and Company was assigned a job by the Management of TISCO for cleaning the Bins in the Sinter Plant area and that he as well as other two persons, namely, Ajay Kumar Dhal and Sukhdeo Karkamar being employees of the said M/s H.K. Singori and Company were asked to clean the Bins and while they were cleaning wall of the Bins the column of dust gave in, as a result of which it fell upon the two persons, namely, Ajay Kumar Dhal and Sukhdeo Karkamar and both of them died. Thereupon, a case was registered



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top