SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Jhk) 918

JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
DILIP KUMAR SINHA, J.
Baleshwar Yadav alias Shyamji
Versus
State of Jharkhand.
Cri. Appeal No. 1306 of 2006
Decided on : 11 -12 -2007.

Advocates appeared
Jitendra S. Singh, for Appellant. A.P.P, for State.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of legal evidence and proof for each element of the charged offenses, as well as the consideration of the nexus with an unlawful organization based on recovered incriminating materials.

Headnote:

Criminal Appeal - Conviction under Sections 386, 307, and 323, I.P.C., Section 25(1-B) a, 26, and 27, Arms Act, and Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the charges under Sections 386, 307, and 323, I.P.C., and Sections 26, 27, and 25(1-B)a of the Arms Act, and Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908. The key legal provisions discussed included the elements of each offense, the requirement of legal evidence, and the burden of proof on the prosecution.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant was convicted under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, Arms Act, and Criminal Law Amendment Act based on the prosecution's story of his involvement in criminal activities, possession of firearms, and association with an unlawful organization. The appellant denied his guilt and claimed to be falsely implicated.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges under Sections 386, 307, and 323, I.P.C., but upheld the charges under Sections 26, 27, and 25(1-B)a of the Arms Act, and Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908. The judgment of conviction and order of sentence against the appellant were affirmed with modifications.

Issues: The issues included the lack of legal evidence for certain charges, the validity of the appellant's arrest, and the sufficiency of proof for the charges under different acts and sections.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the failure of the prosecution to provide legal evidence for certain charges, the inconsistency in witness testimonies, and the lack of proof for specific elements of the offenses. The court also considered the nexus of the appellant with the unlawful organization based on the recovery of incriminating materials.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the judgment of conviction and order of sentence against the appellant were affirmed with modifications.

JUDGEMENT :- The Criminal Appeal is directed against the judgment of his conviction dated 3-8-2006 and order of sentence passed by Shri R. B. Gupta, Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C., Latehar in Sessions Case No. 12 of 2006 whereby the appellant Baleshwar Yadav @ Shyamji was convicted under Sections 386, 307 and 323, I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years, 10 years and simple imprisonment for one year respectively and fines with default stipulation. He was further convicted under Section 25(1-B) a, 26 and 27, Arms Act and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three years and fine of Rs. 2,000/-, rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and fine of Rs. 2,000/- and rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and fine of Rs. 2,000/-respectively with default stipulations of imprisonment. Finally he was convicted under Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908 and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for 3 years and fine with default stipulation. Sentences were directed by the trial court to run concurrently.

2. The prosecution story as it stands narrated in the written report ( Ext. 6) of the informant P.W. 9 Harish Kumar Pathak, S.I. of Police, Kuru Police Station ( Latehar District) addressed to the Officer-in-charge, Chandwa Police Station ( District Latehar) was that he received information from the Superintendent of Police, Lohardagga on 22-8-2005 in the wee hours at about 2 a.m. that the appellant Baleshwar Yadav, Zonal Commander of M.C.C. was staying at village Rajgurua and pursuant to such information, three raiding parties of police were organized on the command of the S.P., Lohardagga and the raiding parties arrived at village Rajgurua where the informant was communicated by the said S.P. that though Baleshwar Yadav alias Shyamji was staying there for some time but he proceeded to the house of the widow namely Parvati Devi at village Senha within Chandwa Police Station and accordingly he was directed to immediately conduct raid. The informant informed Chandwa Police Station on wireless by requesting to assist in the raid to be conducted for the arrest of the appellant and the raiding parties arrived at village Senha. On the command of the S.P., Lohardagga when the door of the suspected house was knocked, a woman came out and in the same transaction, a person attempted to escape from the back door of the house carrying a bag. When that person was challenged and asked to stop, he turned back and resorted fire from his pistol but misfired. The raiding party commanded him to surrender but the person again fired shot. Fires were exchanged by the raiding party including the informant in the air, only with a view to terrorize and after chase the appellant was apprehended and a pistol was recovered from his possession which contained two cartridges of 9 m.m. in the magazine i.e. one misfired and another fired cartridge. On search of the bag of the appellant, in presence of the witnesses, the informant narrated that Rs.1,00,000/- ( one lakh) in cash, letter pad of C.P.I. (M), receipt books, papers relating to transaction of levy, pomphlets and many other incriminating materials were recovered. The appellant confessed that he was the Zonal Commander of M.C.C. The pistol recovered from his possession was found made in Italy but without authority or licence of such possession. The appellant was arrested and seizure list of the articles recovered from his possession was prepared in presence of the independent witnesses. On the statement of the informant, Chandwa P.S. Case No. 80 of 2005 was registered on 22-08-2005 for the offence under Sections 386, 307, 333, 323, I.P.C., under Section 25(1-B) a/26/27 Arms Act and under Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908. The appellant was remanded to judicial custody on 23-8-2005.

3. The police after investigation submitted charge-sheet against the appellant Baleshwar Yadav @ Shyamji under aforesaid Sections in various Acts in which F.I.R. was lodged.

4. The appella































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top