D.N.PATEL
Mahendra Vishwakarma – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently submitted that the order passed by the Certificate Officer, Baghmara, Distt. Dhanbad, has unnecessarily interfered with the title of the present petitioner upon the property, in question, especially, when the title suit filed by Respondent No.5 being Title Suit No. 58 of 2008, is pending before the Sub Judge-I, Dhanbad. Even injunction application preferred under Order 39, Rules 1 & 2 of Code of Civil Procedure is pending before the trial court and has not yet been decided in favour of Respondent No.5, who is plaintiff in Titie Suit No. 15 of 2008. Thus, the Circle Officer, Baghmara, District-Dhanbad, who has granted permission of construction upon the suit property is nothing, but, an interference with the justice delivery system. Revenue Officer has no power, jurisdiction and authority to decide title of the property, in question.
2. It is also vehemently submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the owner of the property and permission of construction has been given to Respondent No. 5 by the Circle Officer, Baghmara, District-Dhanbad vide order dated 4th of January, 2008, Annexure-7 to the memo of p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.