Pradeep Kumar, J.-Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the Respondent.

2. The instant First Appeal has been filed on behalf of the appellant against the judgment dated 11.5.2004 and decree dated 26.5.2004 passed by Sri Narendra Kumar Srivastava, 1st Additional District Judge, Gumla in Divorce Case No.2 of 2002 by which judgment the suit was decreed and marriage between the appellant-petitioner and respondent-opposite party was dissolved. However, the appellant has preferred this appeal since, the learned Additional District Judge, although, granted divorce, but in para 25 of his judgment directed the appellant-husband to allow the respondent-wife to remain in the house in which she is residing at present and the appellant-petitioner was further directed to give electricity, water and other facilities to the Respondent so that she may live in the house with the status of the petitioner till she is remarried. If, any report regarding any assault, mis-behaviour to the respondent is reported then the respondent will be at liberty to take legal action in accordance with law.

3. It is this observation against which the appellant has filed this appeal