SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Jhk) 444

D.N.PATEL
Ayodhya Prasad Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwan Sharma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Satyanarayan Pd.
For the Opp. Parties : None.

Order

The present petition has been preferred against an order, passed by tile Additional Munsiff I, Ranchi, dated 16th July, 2009 in Title Suit No. 123 of 2004, whereby, the amendment application preferred by the present petitioner (original plaintiff) under Order VI Rule 17 to be read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code has been dismissed.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, at length, who has submitted that the petitioner is an original plaintiff, who has instituted Title Suit No. 123 of 2004, on the basis of a registered sale deed in favour of the original plaintiff and thereafter an amendment application was preferred by the petitioner under Order VI Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code as well as under Order I Rule 10 for joining the wife of the present petitioner as plaintiff No. 1 because the sale-deed upon which the original plaintiff is relying upon, is in the name of the wife of the plaintiff and so far as the amendment is concerned, certain other documents and certain facts were also to be brought to the notice of the trial court about the criminal proceedings taken place between the plaintiff and the defendants, which reveals the possession of th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top