D.N.PATEL
Ayodhya Prasad Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwan Sharma – Respondent
The present petition has been preferred against an order, passed by tile Additional Munsiff I, Ranchi, dated 16th July, 2009 in Title Suit No. 123 of 2004, whereby, the amendment application preferred by the present petitioner (original plaintiff) under Order VI Rule 17 to be read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code has been dismissed.
2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, at length, who has submitted that the petitioner is an original plaintiff, who has instituted Title Suit No. 123 of 2004, on the basis of a registered sale deed in favour of the original plaintiff and thereafter an amendment application was preferred by the petitioner under Order VI Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code as well as under Order I Rule 10 for joining the wife of the present petitioner as plaintiff No. 1 because the sale-deed upon which the original plaintiff is relying upon, is in the name of the wife of the plaintiff and so far as the amendment is concerned, certain other documents and certain facts were also to be brought to the notice of the trial court about the criminal proceedings taken place between the plaintiff and the defendants, which reveals the possession of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.