SUSHIL HARKAULI, PRASHANT KUMAR
Pashupati Nath Mandai – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, South Chotanagpur Division, Ranchi – Respondent
This appeal challenges the Judgment and Order dated 16.5.2002 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 3309 of 1999 (R). Instead of repeating the facts, we consider it appropriate to reproduce the entire impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge, which is as follows:
"6/16.5.2002:- The petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 2.7.97 passed by respondent no. 3. Special Officer, Schedule Area regulation, Ranchi in SAR Case No. 2341 1992-93 whereby he has ordered for restoration of the land in favour of respondent no. 4 under the provisions of Section 71 A of the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act (shortly C.N.T. Act) and also the orders dated 31.7.99 and 26.10.99 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi in S.A.R. Appeal No. 137R-15 of 1997-98 and the Commissioner, South Chotanagpur Division, Ranchi in S.A.R. Revision No. 118/99 respectively whereby the appeal and revision filed by the petitioner have been dismissed.
2. Petitioner's case is that he has been coming in possession of the land appertaining to R.S. Plot No. 1080 under Khata No. 112 of Village-Pandra measuring an area of 11 decimals since 5.11.1949 and he constructed boundary wall and puc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.