SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Jhk) 651

PRADEEP KUMAR
Lutan Nath Goswami – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants: M/s P.P.N. Roy, R.N. Sahay.
For the Respondent (State): Mr. LN. Gupta.

JUDGEMENT

Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned Counsel for the State.

2. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 10.7.2002 and order of sentence dated 15.7.2002 respectively passed in S.T. No.225 of 1989 by Shri Rajesh Kumar Dubey, 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Giridih, by which judgment trial Court found all five appellants convicted under Sections 304 Part-1/149 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to undergo R.1. for seven years. Further appellant nos.. 2 and 5 namely Naresh Goswami and Bundo Goswami were separately convicted under Section 324 of the I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo R.1. for one year. All the five appellants were further convicted under Section 148 I. P .C. and sentenced to undergo R.1. for three years. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently. Appellants were also fined Rs.2,000/- each under Section 357 Cr.P.C.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that it will appear from the evidences of the doctor P.W. 9 Dr. B.P. Singh that deceased Somra Manjhi died after one and half months on 31.8.1988 due to septicemia which indicates that his death cannot be related to the injury c



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top