I.A. No. 2325 of 2009 in (C. Rev. No.4 of 2007)

with

I.A. No. 2430 of 2009 in (C. Rev. No. 10 of 2007)

By way of both the interlocutory application, substitution petition has been filed for substituting the heirs of petitioner No. 1 (in I.A. No. 2325 of 2009) and respondent No. 2 (I.A. No. 2430 of 2009), namely Braj Kishore Prasad, who died leaving behind the heirs, whose name has been described in paragraph-2 of the I.A No. 2325 of 2009 and paragraph-4 of the I.A. No. 2430 of 2009, as right to sue still survives. No objection has been raised by the other side.

2. Accordingly, let legal representatives of petitioner No.1 (in I.A. No. 2325 of 2009) and respondent No.2 (in I.A. No. 2430 of 2009), whose description has been given in paragraph-2 of the I.A. No. 2325 of 2009 and paragraph-4 of the I.A. No.2430 of 2009, be substituted in place of petitioner No. 1 (in I.A. No. 2325 of 2009) and respondent No.2 (in LA. No. 2430 of 2009). Substituted heirs have already been appeared through lawyer.

3. Thus, both the I.As. stand disposed of.

Civil Review No.4 of 2007 with Civil Review No.10 of 2007

4. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for r