D.N.PATEL
Satlal Mahto – Appellant
Versus
Rudlal Mahto – Respondent
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that an application for amendment in the plaint was preferred by the petitioner, who is the original plaintiff and partly the said application was allowed and partly it was rejected. Paragraphs vi to x of the amendment application was not allowed to be amended and, them fore, the present petition has been preferred. Paragraphs vi to x of the amendment application are as under:--
"(vi) After paragraph 15, a sub para "15A" be added as follows:
15A. That so far as the lands of Khata No. 48 are concern, the father of the defendant has received compensation amount also awarded in L.R. Case No. 26/83 for acquisition of the land (for Bazar Samittee) measuring 1.93 Acres (Khata, No. 48) consisting of plot no. 2143, Area 1.75 Acres and plot no. 2145 Area 0.18 Acre. Hence, the lands measuring 1.93 Acres should be deducted from the share of the defendants.
In addition to the above lands, the lands measuring 0.50 Acre under Khata No. 48 has been sold by defendants and their persons. Hence, this much area should also be deducted from their share.
Thus, the suit lands under Khata No. 48, Area 19.25 Acres after deducting the area 2.43 Acres
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.