PRAKASH TATIA, BHAGWATI PRASAD
Madhu Sudan Mittal – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
The learned counsel for the C.B.I. has come-up with a definite conclusion that there are irregularities and illegalities which require investigation and for that they need assistance of experts in financial matters and technical matters.
2. They are praying that a direction be issued to the Central Electricity Authority and the Comptroller and Auditor General of India for assistance.
3. The authorities mentioned hereinabove on being approached by C.B.I. would consider extending assistance to the C.B.I. because the matter involved is very serious in nature and unless technical assistance is available to the C.B.I., they may not be able to conclude definite what is required to be done.
4. In that view of the matter, both the authorities i.e. the Central Electricity Authority and the Comptroller and Auditor General of India may consider the request of the C.B.I. favourably.
5. The matter will be taken up by this Court again on 18th May, 2011 and by that time both these authorities may extend assistance to the C.B.I.
6. The report submitted by the C.B.I. is returned in original to the C.B.I. counsel.
7. We are informed by the learned counsel for the C.B.I. that in an earlier enquiry, a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.