By Court.-Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. We are deciding this bunch of four matters by taking facts of LPA No. 484 of 2010. Though the other appeals are arising out of separate orders and containing different amount of surpluses in the hands of Schools and different amount of fee hike, but the principal on which the Jharkhand Education Tribunal, Ranchi has decided the matters, is the same and learned counsel for the parties submitted that taking into account the facts of the case no. 32/2009 (JET) of the Jharkhand Education Tribunal, Ranchi will serve the purpose for deciding all Letters Patent Appeals, therefore, all Letters Patent Appeals are decided by this common order.

3. It appears that separate applications were filed by the students/parents in relation to the alleged unreasonable hike in the school fees for the year 2009-10, upon which initially a blanket order issuing some direction to all the schools in the State of Jharkhand was passed. However, the said interim order was set aside by the High Court and thereafter, the Tribunal proceeded to decide the issue vide order dated 10th April, 2010. It further appears from the impugned order dated 10th, April, 2