2011 Supreme(Jhk) 740
2011 (3) JLJR 425
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
R.K.MERATHIA, D.N.UPADHYAY
State of Jharkhand
Swapan Kumar Jha @ Sapan Kumar
Amarendra Kumar Sharma @ Vickey
Rockey Dutta @ Rocky Dutta ... Appellant
versus
Swapan Kumar Jha
State of Jharkhand
State of Jharkhand
State of Jharkhand ... Respondent
Death Reference No. 02 of 2010 with Criminal Appeal No. 669 of 2010 with Criminal Appeal No. 905 of 2010 with Criminal Appeal No. 779 of 2010
Criminal Appeal 669 of 2010
Decided on : 29/7/2911
For the appellant (Cr. Appeal 669/2010):M/s. B.M.Tripathy, Sr.Advocate
Nutan Sharma & N K Jaiswal For the appellant ( Cr. Appeal 905/2010): Mr.Shree Nivas Roy For the appellant ( Cr. Appeal 779/2010):Mr.S.K.Murthy For the State of Jharkhand (in all cases): Mr. T.N.Verma, Addl.P.P. For the Informant : M/s R.S. Majumdar & Rajesh Kumar
Headnote:A) Indian Penal Code, 1860-Sections 364A/302/201/34:- Conviction of the accused on grounds of murder after kidnapping is upheld on the basis of circumstantial evidence as the chain of events established beyond reasonable doubt that accused had selected their targets and with perfect planning carried out the kidnapping and in lieu of it committed the murder. (Paras 17 and 22 to 24)
B) Criminal Trial – Death sentence of the accused upheld as the accused is none other than cousin of deceased who was 19 years old youngster and after kidnapping him, he was killed in a coldblooded manner and demanded ransom money even after killing the target and hence it fits one of the rarest of rare kinds. (Para 29)
D.N.Upadhyay, J. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned Counsel for the State in all these cases. Swapan Kumar Jha,Appellant in Criminal Appeal 669 of 2010, Amarendra Kumar Sharma @ Vickey, Appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 905 of 2010 and Rockey Dutta, Appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 779 of 2010 have been referred to hereinafter as appellants no. 1, 2 and 3 respectively.
These appeals have been directed against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 1.7.2010 and 7.7.2010 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, FTC III, Dhanbad, in Sessions Trial No.88 of 2009 whereby all the appellants have been held guilty for the offences punishable under sections 364A/302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and accordingly appellants no.2 and 3 have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) each and in default of payment, to undergo further imprisonment for six months. Appellant No. 1 Swapan Kumar Jha has been awarded death sentence for the offence punishable under section 364A/302 IPC subject to confirmation of the order of conviction and sentence by the High Court. Besides above, all the three appellants have been further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/-each under section 201 IPC and in default of payment of the fine, they shall suffer further imprisonment for six months.
2. Prosecution case, as it appears from the written report lodged by Sri Sudhanshu Shekhar Ojha is that on 28.9.2008 at about 4.30 P.M after receiving a phone call, Sumit (deceased) son of the informant after informing his mother that he would be coming back within half an hour, left home, but did not return. The informant and other family members got worried and made a search for Sumit, but of no avail. With regard to the missing of Sumit, information was given to the Police Station on 29.9.2008 after which Station Diary Entry was made at Jharia Police Station.
It is further disclosed that on 1.10.2008 in the morning, the informant on his land-line phone No. 2460618 received a call and the unknown caller demanded ransom from the informant. The aforesaid call made the informant under belief that his son Sumit has been kidnapped by some person. Thereafter, a written report was lodged on 1.10.2008 at Jharia Police Station on the basis of which Jharia P.S Case No. 280 of 2008 under sections 364A of the Indian Penal Code was registered against the holder of Mobile No. 9798148773. During investigation, dead body of Sumit was recovered after which Sections 302/201/34 IPC had also been added on 23.10.2008.
During investigation, involvement of these appellants in the alleged kidnapping and murder of Sumit Kumar Ojha alias Govind was surfaced whereafter Swapan Kumar Jha and Amarendra Kumar Sharma @ Vickky were apprehended and they made their confessional statement disclosing therein that they had hired an Indica Car No. JH 09D 6666 and made a plan to kidnap Gautam Kumar Ojha (brother of the deceased) who was studying at Kolkata. Thereafter, all the three appellants went Kolkata on 24.9.2008 and stayed in a Hotel. The plan of kidnapping for ransom was mainly hatched out by Swapan Kumar Jha and initially he made target to Gautam who is none else, but the maternal cousin of Swapan Kumar Jha and accordingly Gautam was taken into contact. In course of wandering with the appellants, Gautam Kumar Ojha sent SMS to his room-mate informing that he is in the company of the accused persons. Considering the aforesaid aspect, the appellants dropped their plan to kidnap Gautam Kumar Ojha and returned to Jharia (Dhanbad) and again targeted Sumit Kumar @ Govind who was younger brother of Gautam. On some pretext, Sumit was called by the appellants whereafter, Sumit met with them near Children Park, Jharia and from there, he boarded in the Indica Car occupied by appellants Swapan Kumar Jha and Vickky Sharma besides the driver of the said Car. Sumit was