SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Jhk) 751

R.K.MERATHIA, P.P.BHATT
Krishna Purty @ Kishun Purty – Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Rajesh Kumar,
For the State : APP

Order

By Court. This appeal arises out of the Judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 27.05.2003 and 28.05.2003 respectively, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 1, Chaibasa, in Sessions Trial No. 31 of 2000, convicting the appellant under section 302 IPC and sentencing him to undergo R.I. for life and pay a fine of Rs.4,000/-and in default R.I. for six months was imposed.

2. The prosecution case is based on the dying declaration of Jema Purty ( deceased-wife of the appellant). She gave the said statement in the ladies ward of hospital on 11.9.1999 at about 10 P.M. before Shakuntala Devi, the Sub Inspector of Police-, Sadar Thana ( Court Witness-1), to the effect that the appellant had two wives. The first wife was alive. The appellant was working as a Peon in the Forest Department. He was not providing her expenses, for which there was quarrel between them in the morning on that day. The appellant called the deceased in a bungalow of one Forest Officer (K.K. Chatterjee) where she reached at about 6 P.M. The officer was not present. In the veranda, where the appellant used to live, he started quarreling with her again. The appellant became fu














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top