SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Jhk) 880

R.K.MERATHIA
Baijnath Sonar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:Mr. J.P. Pandey, Advocate
For the State: Mr. D.K. Prasad, APP

JUDGMENT :

This appeal has been filed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 09.10.2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.-III, Garhwa in Sessions Case No. 335 of 1988 convicting the appellants-Baijnath Sonar, Sarju Sonar and Rajendra Sonar under section 326 IPC and they have been sentenced to undergo R.I. for three years, whereas appellant-Surendra Sonar was convicted under section 323 IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for six months.

2. The prosecution case in brief is that a fardbeyan was lodged by the informant-Baikunt Choubey on 29.07.1987 at about 10.45 AM that when he went on his land, he found the appellants ploughing it. There was litigation with regard to the land in question and the prosecution party had a decree from the Court of Commissioner at Ranchi in their favour and a demand was also settled. The informant along with his brother Hirachand Choubey went to the land and asked the accused persons not to plough it. All of a sudden, appellants-Baijnath Sonar and Sarju Sonar and one accused Ramsurat Sonar (now deceased) hit him by 'garasha', placed nearby, on his head causing bleeding injury. Appellants-Rajendra








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top