PRASHANT KUMAR
Jessop @ Company Ltd – Appellant
Versus
M. A. Sidiqi – Respondent
This application is directed against the order dated 17.12.2003 in C.P. Case No. 275 of 2003 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro whereby he took cognizance against the petitioners under section 469 and 471 of the IPC.
2. It appears that O.P. No. 2 filed a complaint alleging therein that he entered into an agreement with petitioner no. 1 for supply of workman/ watch-guard. It is further stated that in view of the agreement, a work order issued on 18.2.1994, however, the said work order was amended from time to time lastly on 1.4.1999. It is further alleged that the petitioners/accused unilaterally made variation in the aforesaid work order vide letter dated 26.6.2001. It is further stated that the accused/petitioners have no power to make variation unilaterally in the terms of contract. It is stated that such variation made in the contract with intent to cause financial loss to the complainant and also to harm his reputation. Accordingly, it is alleged that the accused/petitioners committed an offence under section 469 and 471 of the IPC.
3. It appears that complainant examined himself on S.A. and also three witnesses during the enquiry under section 202 of the Cr.P.C..
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.