PRASHANT KUMAR
Satyendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Prashant Kumar, J.-This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 23.3.1988 passed in Mandu P.S. Case No. 470 of 1986, whereby learned Special Judge, Essential Commodities Act, Hazaribagh took cognizance against petitioners under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act and under Sections 414/120B of the Indian Penal Code.
2. It is submitted by Mr. A.N. Deo, learned counsel for the petitioners that after repeal of Bihar Coal Control Order in the year 1984, coal did not remain essential commodity, therefore, no license required for dealing in coal. Accordingly, he submits that petitioners had not violated any Control Order, thus, no offence under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act is made out. He further submits that there is no material to show that any theft was reported in relation to coal in question. Thus, no offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code is made out.
3. On the other hand, Mr. Krishna Shankar, learned Addl. P.P. submits that Bihar Coal Control Order, 1956 was repealed by Bihar Trade Articles (Licenses Unification) Order, 1984 (hereinafter referred as Unification Order). He further submits that as per Schedule-I Part-E of Unific
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.