SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Jhk) 96

2012 (1) JLJR 249
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
P.P. BHATT, Prakash Tatia, JJ.
The State of Jharkhand &Ors.....Appellants
Vs.
Shailendra Kumar Sinha....... Respondent
L.P.A No. 380 of 2011
Decided on : 18th January, 2012

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants: Mr. Shamim Akhtar, (S.C. Mines)
For the Respondents: Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Rohit Roy

Headnote:Registration Act, 1908---Section 71---Registration of document---Registering Authority cannot sit over the document by not registering it---Registering Authority should either register the document or pass appropriate order refusing to register the document---However , no direction can be issued directing Registering Authority to register a document. (Paras 2 and 4)

Judgment

Learned counsel for the petitioner-respondent now agreed that a direction may be issued to the Registering Authority to pass appropriate order; either to register the document or pass appropriate order refusing to register the document which should be in accordance with law and the pleas which are not available in law may not be taken into account by the Registering Authority and should not be decided under influence by the reply filed by the State.

2. Since, for registration of a document the competent authority is Registrar/Sub-Registrar of the area, who is required to take a decision with respect to registration of the document and even higher authorities directions can be ignored and without knowing the reasons for refusal to register the documents, the challenge cannot be made and in our opinion, directing the Registering Authority to register the document will be usurping the power of the said authority. Therefore, in view of the statement of the petitioners, it is ordered that the Registering Authority shall pass the order of registering the document or shall pass appropriate order refusing to register the document, which may be in brief and be communicated to the writ petitioners. The decision may be taken within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, which may be provided by the petitioners to the Registering Authority upon refusal to register the document in question the petitioner will be free to avail remedy available in law.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners-respondents submitted that this is a practice in various districts to not to register the document and this Court has also issued directions in L.P.A. No. 08 of 2007 on 3.07.2007, on the basis of assurances given by the Advocate General.

4. Be that as it may be, the Registering Authority cannot sit over the document by not registering the document and at the same time not passing the order of refusal. The State is directed to ensure that in future the Registering Authority should either register the document or pass appropriate order refusing to register the document.

5. With the above observations and directions, this L.P.A is disposed of.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top