By the Court.....:....Mr. Surnit Prakash, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner vehemently submitted that the petitioner was appointed as an Anganbari Sevika for the Anganbari Centre of Village Birigora, district East Singbhum with effect from 24th July. 2007. The appointment letter is at annexure 1 to the memo of the petition and thereafter the petitioner was working honestly, diligently sincerely and to the satisfaction of the respondents. Counsel for the petitioner further submitted that some dissatisfied soul., must have preferred complaints and without any notice and without giving any opportunity of being heard to the petitioner the respondents terminated the services of the petitioner unilaterally arbitrarily and abruptly vide letter dated 31st March. 2008 (Annexure 3 to the memo of the petition) and hence the same deserves to be dismissed.

2. Counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the impugned order at annexure 3 shows no reason for termination. Thus the impugned order is a non-speaking one. It is also submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that while passing the impugned order some communication bearing letter No. 206. dated 15th February. 2008,