PRAKASH TATIA, JAYA ROY
Kamal Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
By Court.-Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The appellants-writ petitioners are aggrieved against the judgment dated 25th July. 2011 by which" the writ petitions of the writ petitioners were dismissed.
3. The facts which are relevant for the purpose of deciding this writ petition are required to be narrated in brief only because there is in fact no dispute with respect to the factual aspect.
4. The petitioners alongwith others were initially appointed on the post of "Junior Engineers in the Rural Development Department in the erstwhile State of Bihar. about 30 years ago from now i.e. they were appointed in the year 1981. The petitioners were dilly qualified for the post. However after taking their services for six years as Junior Engineers the State Government on 27th June 1987, passed another order and appointed these persons on the posts of Assistant Engineers temporarily for a period of six months and it is mentioned in the order dated 27th June. 1987 itself that the said appointments are in anticipation to the recommendation which may come from the State Public Service Commission. However so far as appointment on the post of Junior Engineers was concerned that app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.