POONAM SRIVASTAV
Kapildev Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
Ajmerun Bibi – Respondent
1. The instant appeal is preferred at the instance of the owner of the vehicle.
2. The Claim Tribunal has recorded a finding that since the vehicle involved in the accident was a TATA407. It was a heavy motor vehicle, the driving licence vide licence no. 1199/98/Prof. was valid from 23.07.2001 to 24.07.2004 and thereafter renewed from 21.09.2004 to 20.09.2007.
3. The Tribunal was of the view that since the vehicle was being driven against the terms and conditions of the insurance policy, the Insurance Company, namely, United India Insurance Company Limited is not liable to pay the compensation and the appellant was fastened with the entire liability.
4. Submission of Shri Indrajit Sinha, Advocate is that this question was never adjudicated by the Tribunal as to whether TATA407 is a heavy vehicle or not? Reliance has been placed on the definition of the "light motor vehicle Act" enumerated in Section 2(21) of the Motor Vehicle Act,1988 which reads as follows:
"light motor vehicle" means a transport vehicle or omnibus, the gross vehicle weight of either of which or a motor car or tractor or roadroller the unladen weight of any of which, does not exceed, [7,500] kilograms. This w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.