SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Jhk) 341

R.R.PRASAD
Veer Krishna Sahay – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sumeet Gadodia, for the petitioner, APP, for the State.
Rajesh Kumar, for the O.P. No.2.

JUDGMENT

By Court.-This application has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding of Complaint-cum-Protest Case No. 2763 of 2008 including the order dated 18.12.2010/20.12.2010 whereby learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi having found prima facie case being made out against the petitioner of the offences punishable under Sections 417, 418 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code was pleased to summon the petitioner to face trial.

2. Before coming to the case of the prosecution certain facts, disclosed in the petition, which will have beating upon the prosecution case, need to be stated.

3. According to the petitioner, 33 kathas of land bearing M.S. Plot No. 1480, appertaining to Holding No. 1186-B, situated in Ward No. 17 (new) at 70, S.K. Sahay Road, Circular Road, P.S. Lalpur, Ranchi fell to the share of the petitioner and his sister-in-law (bhabhi)-Smt. Madhur Sahay in a family partition. Thereupon, the petitioner entered into a development agreement with opposite party No. 2 for constructing a multi-storeyed building. While construction was going on District Administration raised objection over the construction, as the sa





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top