SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Jhk) 1023

R.R.PRASAD
Dinesh Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
H.K. Jha, for the petitioner.
S. Shekhar Pd., APP. for the State of Jharkhand.

JUDGMENT

By Court. - Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. No body appeared on behalf of the opposite party.

3. The facts giving rise to these two applications are that Late Dr. Awani Kumar Mukherjee, the grand-father of the complainant Kalyan Kumar Mukherjee had taken land bearing plot No. 187. khata No. 24, situated in mauza Pandedih over which he constructed a building consisting of six rooms along with dining space. latrine, bathroom etc. In the said building Late Dr. Awani Kumar Mukherjee used to run his clinic. For his assistance he appointed the petitioner-Dinesh Prasad as his compounder. In course of time Dr. Awani Kumar Mukherjee died leaving behind his three sons namely Amiya Kumar Mukherjee, Ashit Kumar Mukherjee and Ashok Kumar Mukherjee and his widow Smt. Sabita Mukherjee as his heirs and legal representatives. At the time of death of Dr. Awani Kumar Mukherjee, his elder son Amiya Mukherjee was residing in the said house. but after the death of his father he shifted to the quarter allotted to him along with his wife Smt. Maya Mukherjee (complainant) in Complaint Case No. 567 of 1994, The other two sons of Dr. Awani Kumar











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top