SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Jhk) 227

PRASHANT KUMAR
Satyendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N. Deo. for the petitioners.
Krishna Shankar. APP for the Opp.Party.

JUDGMENT

Prashant Kumar, J.-This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 23.3.1988 passed in Mandu P.S.case No. 470 of 1986. whereby learned Special Judge Essential Commodities Act. Hazarlbagh took cognizance against petitioners under section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act and under Sections 414/120-B of the Indian Penal Code.

2. It is submitted by Mr. A.N. Deo learned counsel for the petitioners that after repeal of Bihar Coal Control Order in the year 1984 coal did not remain essential commodity. Therefore, no license required for dealing in coal. Accordingly, he submits that petitioners had not violated any control order. Thus, no offence under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act is made out. He further submits that there is no material to show that any theft was reported in relation to coal in question Thus, no offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code is made out.

3. On the other hand, Mr. Krishna Shankar, learned Addl. P.P. submits that Bihar Coal Control Order, 1956 was repealed by, Bihar Trade Article (License Unification) Order, 1984 (hereinafter referred as Unification Order). He further submits that as per Schedule I Part E of Unification







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top