JAYA ROY, PRAKASH TATIA
Mahabir Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.The appellant is aggrieved against the judgement dated 29.06.2011 passed in W.P.(C) No. 1565 of 2008 whereby the learned Single Judge set aside the order dated 19.02.2008 passed by the Commissioner, Hazaribagh in Miscellaneous Revision No. 158 of 2005.
3. It will be appropriate to place on record facts in brief :-
The appellants' claimed that, by virtue of a settlement of land in favour of the appellants, their names were required to be entered in the revenue record/in record of rights to be maintained under the Bihar Tenants Holdings (Maintenance of Records) Act, 1973. However, for the said claim of settlement of 8th September, 1925, the appellants' submitted an application No. 37/1961-62 on 27.01.1961 upon which the appellants' names were entered into the revenue records. The appellants continued to pay the rent till the year 1967-68. After 1968, the revenue authorities refused to accept the rent from the appellants. The appellants, in the year 1998, came to know that in the Jamabandi, the name of the respondents have been wrongly entered and because of that reason the revenue authorities are not accepting the rent from the appellants. F
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.