SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Jhk) 1184

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
APARESH KUMAR SINGH, J.
Kamal Kishore and Others - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand and Others – Respondents
WP(C) No. 3660 of 2006
Decided on: 07.08.2012

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners - M/s Ananda Sen & Amit Kr. Verma
For the Respondents - JC to GP-I

Headnote:Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956---Section 3—No proceeding under the Act initiated before issuance of impugned notice for removing unauthorised encroachers over public land---Even if petitioners are encroachers over public land, their eviction can only be made in accordance with law by initiating a proceeding as provided under the Act. (Paras 6 and 7)

       CWJC 229011990; CWJC 241/1999(R)---Referred to.

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This writ petition has been preferred for quashing the notice dated 03.06.2005 issued by the respondent no. where under the petitioners have been directed to vacate the portion of plots which they are occupying, failing which they will be evicted by force. Petitioners have also prayed for quashing of notice published in the paper dated 21.06.2006 whereby the petitioners have been directed to remove their construction and for issuance of further direction to the respondents not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that these petitioners are resident of PWD Colony, Adarsh Nagar, Sakchi, Jamshedpur since more than 40 years and the said area is huge area having vast tract of land which was vacant. It is further submitted that the case of the petitioners is that they have been residing by constructing temporary structures, which were constructed by their ancestors more than 40 to 45 years back. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that there are 54 families residing in the same area and petitioners have been given voter identity cards issued by the Election Commission of India in which house number has also been indicated. It is further stated that petitioners have been alloted Ration Card showing them to be the residents of the said Peon Colony. Petitioners have been suddenly informed by the notice dated 03.06.2005 that they should remove their structures over the land in question otherwise they will be forcefully evicted. It is further stated that suddenly a paper notification was issued on 21.06.2006 informing the petitioners to remove their structures from Khata No. 242 Plot No. 1030 i.e. Peon Colony. Thereafter, on 26.06.2006 steps were taken by the district administration for removing and demolishing the entire colony, but due to public protest they could not succeed.

4. During the course of argument learned counsel for the petitioners has not been able to show any documents which establish their claim that petitioners have been residing in the area since last 40 years. The Voter Identity Cards furnished by them is of the year 1995 and different periods including 2003 and 2004. On the other hand, they have also stated that Ration Cards were issued to them (Annexure-2 series containing the photo copies of the Ration Cards). It appears that the Ration Cards have been issued sometime in the year 1991, 1997, 2001 and 2003 and as such, period obviously does not relate to 40 years as claimed by the petitioners. However, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that no proceeding under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act (now adopted by the State of Jharkhand) has been initiated against the petitioners before issuance of the impugned notice and for removal of the encroachment.

5. The respondents have appeared and filed their counter affidavit wherein it has been categorically stated that the aforesaid piece of land being Khata No. 242 Plot No. 1030 is a Government land belonging to Public Works Department. They have further categorically denied the claim of the petitioners that the petitioners are in possession of land in question since last 40 years. It has also been submitted that the District Administration is launching anti-encroachment drive from time to time as per the order of this Hon’ble Court in C.W.J.C. No. 2290 of 1990 and C.W.J.C. No. 241 of 1999(R) to remove the encroachers, in support of which order dated 18.05.1999 vide Memo No. 504 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Dhalbhum, Jamshedpur has been annexed as Annexure-A. The respondents have stated that from the beginning, there are many Government building constructed for different uses over the said piece of land and it is not a vacant land. The respondents have also stated that proceeding under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act being B.P.L.E. Case No. 86/96-97 had been initiated wherein orders were passed on




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top