POONAM SRIVASTAV
Ravindra Taunk – Appellant
Versus
Vasanti B. Taunk – Respondent
Poonam Srivastav, J
1. The instant appeal arises out of the judgment and decree dated 29.5.1993 and 10.6.1993 respectively passed by Shri Mahendra Narayan Singh, 2nd Additional Subordinate Judge, Jamshedpur in Partition Suit No. 122 of 1990.
2. The suit was filed for partition of the joint Hindu family properties which consists of 13 properties. The plaintiff instituted the suit on the ground that common ancestor of the parties Nanji Govindji Taunk died on 25th March, 1955 and all the aforesaid 13 properties are joint Hindu family property and, the plaintiff and defendants are co-sharers. The plaintiff claimed that the properties are liable to be partitioned. The plaintiff claimed following reliefs:-
(a) For a preliminary decree for 1/7th share in the properties described in Schedule 'B'
(b) For appointment of a survey knowing pleader commissioner to demarcate the plaintiff's 1/7th share in the said Schedule "B" properties;
(c) For a final decree on the basis of the pleader commissioner's report and allotment chart;
(d) For costs of the suit;
(e) For any other relief or reliefs to which the plaintiff may be entitled under law and equity.
3. Nanji Govindji Taunk left behind his widow i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.