P.P.BHATT
Anil Kumar Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Rameshwar Prasad Mehta – Respondent
By the Court.- The present application is filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code against the order dated 12.07.2010, passed by the Sub-Judge-1, Hazaribagh in T.S. No. 104 of 2009, whereby the learned Sub-Judge has rejected the counter claim filed on behalf of the defendant No.6, petitioner herein, by way of his written statement filed on 12th April, 2010.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
3. Perused the papers.
4. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are the original plaintiff.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant pointed out that the respondent No.2 died during the pendency of this writ petition and his legal heirs have been substituted and notices have been duly served on the legal heirs and representatives of the deceased-respondent No. 2. It is submitted that though notices have been duly served upon the legal heirs and representatives of the deceased-respondent No.2, but none appears on their behalf. So far as respondent No.3 (original defendant No.8) is concerned, he is represented by the learned senior counsel Mr. M. Sohail Anwar.
6. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3 (original defendan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.