SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Jhk) 1084

RAKESH RANJAN PRASAD
Mokro Gagrai – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.R. Prasad, J.

1. The sole appellant, Mokro Gagrai was put on trial to face charge under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act on an accusation that he knowingly keep explosive substance (bomb) under this control not for a lawful object. Learned Sessions Judge having found the appellant guilty convicted him under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act and consequently sentenced him to undergo RI for a period of two and half years.

2. The case of they prosecution is that on 3.8.1990 the informant, Oman Kangari, PW 3 while was on patrolling duty along with other police personnel, namely, Anil Kumar Mawar (PW 2), Radhey Shyam Singh (PW 4), S.D. Upadhya, B.B. Singh, Havildar Mahabir Minj and Havildar Ganeshi Harijan, apprehended one Naresh Kashea @ Chengna @ Bihari on the road near Deogaon school and on his disclosure, a raid was laid in the house of this appellant at village Banmalipur in presence of two independent witnesses, namely, Bishwa Kachchap and Raju Saw and recovered a country made live bomb kept concealed under heap of straw and seized it under seizure-list (Ext. 2). On being questioned, the appellant informed to the raiding party that the said bomb had been g














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top