SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Jhk) 305

N.N.TIWARI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Akhileshwar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Jharkhand State Electricity Board – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: S. Srivastava and D.K. Lal, Advs. in W.P. (S) Nos. 4487, 5407 and 5408/2005, Anil Kumar and Satish Keshari, Advs. in W.P. (S) No. 4889/2005, Vijay Kumar Gupta, Adv. in W.P. (S) No. 5470/2005, A.K. Prasad and J.S. Pasari, Advs. W.P. (S) No. 5913/2005, Sunil Kumar, Adv. in W.P. (S) No. 5932, 5942 and 5956/2005, Mukesh Kr. Sinha, Rahul Kumar and V.K. Gupta, Advs. in W.P. (S) No. 6086/2005, Vijoy Pratap Singh, Sr. Adv., Ashok Kumar Sinha and Lakshmi Murmu, Advs. in W.P. (S) No. 5092, 5138 and 5153/2005 and K.K. Jha 'Kamal' and B.N.J. Prabhakar, Advs. in W.P. (S) No. 5886/2005
For Respondents/Defendant: A.K. Sinha and M.K. Jha, Sr. Advs., R. Krishna, A.K. Jha and Siddhartha Ranjan, Advs. in W.P. (S) Nos. 4487 and 6086/2005 and Anil Kr. Sinha, Sr. Adv., R. Krishna and Siddhartha Ranjan, Advs. in W.P. (S) Nos. 4889, 5092, 5138, 5153, 5407, 5408, 5470, 5886, 5913, 5932, 5942 and 5956

ORDER

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.

1. The petitioners of all the abovementioned writ petitions were in the service of the erstwhile Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna (hereinafter to be referred as 'Erstwhile State Electricity Board1). They retired prior to creation of Jharkhand State Electricity Board, Ranchi (hereinafter to be referred as (J.S.E.B.) and present Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna (hereinafter to be referred as 'B.S.E.B.') i.e. prior to 1st April, 2001. They had been getting their pensions after retirement but after the creation of the said separate Board i.e. J.S.E.B. and 'B.S.E.B., payments or pensions have been suddenly stopped since June, 2005. The two Boards are now passing buck on one another for the financial liability to be born in paying previous and other dues of the petitioners. However, both the Board have admitted that the petitioners are entitled to get pension and other benefits as they are retired employees of the erstwhile State Electricity Board. The only dispute is regarding liability of payments of the dues and pensions of the petitioners, which they respectively deny and which ultimately culminated into the stoppage of pension of the petitioners lea

















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top