Ramesh Kumar Merathia, J.

1. Heard the parties finally.

2. The petitioners claim that they have a right to be considered for regularisation on the ground that they are working under work charged establishment continuously without any break; and. for payment of wages from March, 2002.

3. Mr. Bibhuti Pandey learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are still working under the work-charged establishment. He relied on a statement signed on 24.2.2006 (Annexure-10) by one Shri Devendra Prasad Singh, the then Executive Engineer and the Letter No. 274 dated 4.5.2007 (Annexure-11) issued by the same officer along with the statements (Annexure-12). He submitted that the said Letter No. 274 dated 4.5.2007 (Annexure-11) was in reply to the letter dated 26.4.2007 of the Deputy Secretary and the letter dated 24.4.2007 of the Chief Engineer. He further submitted that when the petitioners relied on the said documents, the respondents are saying that the said letters were issued wrongly by the said officer Shri Devendra Prasad Singh. Relying on the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Ram Prasad Singh v. State of Jharkhand 2005 (3) JCR 9 (FB) : 2005 (3) J